If your growth flywheel is stuck, here’s how you can fix it.
Every growth team knows the playbook. Build a flywheel that runs on three core engines: acquisition to bring in new users, activation to convert them to value realization, and retention to keep them engaged long-term. Get all three humming in harmony, and you've got a self-sustaining growth machine.
For many apps, the flywheel gets stalled at that last critical point: retention.

The numbers tell a sobering story. In gaming apps, 55% of users never return after their first session. For non-gaming apps, two-thirds disappear within three days of installation. And the attrition continues—after 30 days, nearly half (46%) of all newly acquired users, both paid and organic, have uninstalled the app entirely.
30‑day uninstall rates across Gaming and Consumer apps, split by paid vs. organic
All those users you worked so hard to aquire—optimizing ad creative, bidding on keywords, testing landing pages—drop off before they can ever experience your apps’ value.
When it comes to inactivity, the clock ticks differently for different users. Non-payers who are inactive for just three days have a 35% chance of returning on their own. Paying users show more resilience, but even they hit that same critical threshold after six days of inactivity, with return rates dropping below one-third.
These inactivity windows (3+ days non-payers, 6+ days payers) represent the optimal moments for re-engagement—when you can capture users who would otherwise be lost and generate the strongest incremental returns.
When it comes to inactivity, the clock ticks differently for different users. Non-payers who are inactive for just three days have a 35% chance of returning on their own. Paying users show more resilience, but even they hit that same critical threshold after six days of inactivity, with return rates dropping below one-third.
These inactivity windows (3+ days non-payers, 6+ days payers) represent the optimal moments for re-engagement—when you can capture users who would otherwise be lost and generate the strongest incremental returns.
Return rate by days inactive, payers vs. non‑payers
Moloco’s AI found riders most likely to book again, so we re-engaged lapsed and low-frequency users without leaning on discounts. That helped us double total orders.
Vu Thu Trang | Senior Performance Marketing Manager, Xanh SM
The economics of re-engagement are compelling. Bringing back dormant users is significantly cheaper than acquiring new ones, and the stakes keep rising. Gaming RPD (Revenue per Download) is up six times since 2014, while non-gaming has nearly doubled (Sensor Tower). Every retained user is worth more than ever.
Looking at our aggregate data, the efficiency gap is dramatic. Re-engagement campaigns cost 4x less per action than user acquisition but generate 896% higher ROAS. The benefits extend beyond immediate returns - AppsFlyer reported an 85% uplift in week 12 retention rates for apps that run re-engagement campaigns compared to those that don't (AppsFlyer App Retention benchmarks 2025).
We wanted to validate these findings, so we analyzed apps running both UA and re-engagement campaigns simultaneously with the same optimization goals and target actions during the same period. In this apples-to-apples comparison, re-engagement delivered 74% lower CPA and 568% higher ROAS.
Meta-Analysis of UA and RE campaigns (matched objectives and time periods). RE campaign outcomes compared to UA
So it’s no surprise why the most sophisticated growth teams are transforming their playbooks. They're continuing to invest in acquisition, while also protecting against churn.
Gaming tells this story well. Despite declining installs, lifetime value in gaming apps is climbing: Day-7 LTV is up 3%, Day-90 ARPPU is up 6% (Moloco State of Mobile Gaming 2025). Players aren't just staying, they're playing longer and across more sessions. Time spent is up. Session count is up. The players come – and they’re given reasons to keep coming back.
The bottom line: your inactive app users are an enormous untapped opportunity.
Recognizing the opportunity is one thing, but marketing can't do this alone. Many of the companies investing in retention are making key shifts across their teams:
Once the organizational structure and technology stack are aligned, the re-engagement strategy itself has four core components.
Using cross-app behavioral signals to predict which users are at risk of migrating to competitors.
Competitive monitoring to identify threats to your customers before they materialize.
Predictive churn modeling sophisticated enough to protect high-value users before you lose them—not after.
Reaching at-risk users in relevant contexts before competitors do.
Timing protection campaigns around competitive threat windows—new game launches, seasonal shopping peaks, fitness motivation cycles.
Coordinating reengagement across channels, and focusing resources on your highest-value segments first.
Going beyond generic messages to dynamic creative and channel-specific messaging that reflect both the user's value and their specific risk profile.
Regularly A/B testing to maximize retention effectiveness. Small improvements in retention rates compound dramatically over time.
Cross-channel attribution that measures protected asset value, not just clicks or installs.
Tracking competitive loss prevention as a core metric.
Measuring ROI as asset protection cost versus replacement acquisition cost. value segments first.